FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

GW5AT-138 vs MPF100T

A comparison of the Gowin Arora V GW5AT-138 and the Microchip PolarFire MPF100T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

GW5AT-138MPF100T
Vendor / familyGowin Arora VMicrochip PolarFire
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)138,240109,000
LUTs as published138,240 LUT4109,000 LUT4
Vendor logic figure— LC109,000 LE
DSP298 27×18 DSP blocks336 18×18 math blocks (MACC)
Block RAM6 Mb6.9 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O312284
Transceivers8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s8 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x8Gen2 x4
Hard processorNoneNone
Process22 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMNon-volatile (SONOS flash)
Packages63
Design toolGowin EDAMicrochip Libero SoC

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The GW5AT-138 has about 27% more logic capacity (138K vs 109K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the MPF100T has 336 18×18 math blocks (MACC) against 298 27×18 DSP blocks on the GW5AT-138.

The MPF100T has more on-chip memory (6.9 Mb vs 6 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the GW5AT-138 and 8 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the MPF100T.

Configuration memory: sram on the GW5AT-138, non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPF100T.

The GW5AT-138 is designed with Gowin EDA and the MPF100T with Microchip Libero SoC.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW5AT-138 (Arora V) and MPF100T (PolarFire).