GW5AT-75 vs XC7A100T
A comparison of the Gowin Arora V GW5AT-75 and the AMD Artix-7 XC7A100T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| GW5AT-75 | XC7A100T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Gowin Arora V | AMD Artix-7 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 86,688 | 101,440 |
| LUTs as published | 86,688 LUT4 | 63,400 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | — LC | 101,440 LC |
| DSP | 213 27×18 DSP blocks | 240 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 4.5 Mb | 4.7 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 312 | 300 |
| Transceivers | 8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s | 8 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x8 | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 0 | 4 |
| Design tool | Gowin EDA | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The XC7A100T has about 17% more logic capacity (101K vs 86.7K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the GW5AT-75 is built from LUT4 and the XC7A100T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (86.7K vs 63.4K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XC7A100T has 240 DSP slices against 213 27×18 DSP blocks on the GW5AT-75.
Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the GW5AT-75 and 8 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A100T.
The GW5AT-75 is designed with Gowin EDA and the XC7A100T with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW5AT-75 (Arora V) and XC7A100T (Artix-7).