GW5AT-75 vs XC7A75T
A comparison of the Gowin Arora V GW5AT-75 and the AMD Artix-7 XC7A75T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| GW5AT-75 | XC7A75T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Gowin Arora V | AMD Artix-7 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 86,688 | 75,520 |
| LUTs as published | 86,688 LUT4 | 47,200 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | — LC | 75,520 LC |
| DSP | 213 27×18 DSP blocks | 180 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 4.5 Mb | 3.7 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 312 | 300 |
| Transceivers | 8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s | 8 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x8 | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 0 | 4 |
| Design tool | Gowin EDA | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The GW5AT-75 has about 15% more logic capacity (86.7K vs 75.5K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the GW5AT-75 is built from LUT4 and the XC7A75T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (86.7K vs 47.2K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the GW5AT-75 has 213 27×18 DSP blocks against 180 DSP slices on the XC7A75T.
The GW5AT-75 has more on-chip memory (4.5 Mb vs 3.7 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the GW5AT-75 and 8 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A75T.
The GW5AT-75 is designed with Gowin EDA and the XC7A75T with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW5AT-75 (Arora V) and XC7A75T (Artix-7).