GW5AT-75 vs XC7K70T
A comparison of the Gowin Arora V GW5AT-75 and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K70T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| GW5AT-75 | XC7K70T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Gowin Arora V | AMD Kintex-7 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 86,688 | 65,600 |
| LUTs as published | 86,688 LUT4 | 41,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | — LC | 65,600 LC |
| DSP | 213 27×18 DSP blocks | 240 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 4.5 Mb | 4.7 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 312 | 300 |
| Transceivers | 8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s | 8 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x8 | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 0 | 2 |
| Design tool | Gowin EDA | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The GW5AT-75 has about 32% more logic capacity (86.7K vs 65.6K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the GW5AT-75 is built from LUT4 and the XC7K70T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (86.7K vs 41K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XC7K70T has 240 DSP slices against 213 27×18 DSP blocks on the GW5AT-75.
The GW5AT-75 is designed with Gowin EDA and the XC7K70T with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GW5AT-75 (Arora V) and XC7K70T (Kintex-7).