GX 2800 vs XCVU27P
A comparison of the Altera Stratix 10 GX/SX GX 2800 and the AMD Virtex UltraScale+ XCVU27P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| GX 2800 | XCVU27P | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Altera Stratix 10 GX/SX | AMD Virtex UltraScale+ |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 1,866,240 | 2,073,600 |
| LUTs as published | 933,120 ALMs | 1,296,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 2,753,000 LE | 2,835,000 SLC |
| DSP | 5,760 variable-precision DSP blocks | 9,216 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 229 Mb | 70.9 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | 270 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 1,160 | 676 |
| Transceivers | 64 × XCVR 28.3 Gb/s, 32 × XCVR 17.4 Gb/s | 32 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s, 48 × GTM 58 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x16 | Gen3 x16 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 4 | 0 |
| Design tool | Altera Quartus Prime | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The XCVU27P has about 11% more logic capacity (2074K vs 1866K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the GX 2800 is built from ALMs and the XCVU27P from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (933K vs 1296K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XCVU27P has 9,216 DSP slices against 5,760 variable-precision DSP blocks on the GX 2800.
The XCVU27P has more on-chip memory (340.9 Mb vs 229 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 96 at up to 28.3 Gb/s on the GX 2800 and 80 at up to 58 Gb/s on the XCVU27P.
The GX 2800 is designed with Altera Quartus Prime and the XCVU27P with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: GX 2800 (Stratix 10 GX/SX) and XCVU27P (Virtex UltraScale+).