FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LAV-AT-E30 vs Ti180

A comparison of the Lattice Avant-E LAV-AT-E30 and the Efinix Titanium Ti180 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LAV-AT-E30Ti180
Vendor / familyLattice Avant-EEfinix Titanium
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)163,000172,800
LUTs as published163,000 LUT4172,800 LUT4
Vendor logic figure262,000 LC176,256 LE
DSP700 18×18 multipliers640 DSP blocks
Block RAM14.4 Mb13.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O349284
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages25
Design toolLattice RadiantEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 163K and 173K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the LAV-AT-E30 has 700 18×18 multipliers against 640 DSP blocks on the Ti180.

The LAV-AT-E30 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the Ti180 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LAV-AT-E30 (Avant-E) and Ti180 (Titanium).