FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LAV-AT-E50 vs Tz170

A comparison of the Lattice Avant-E LAV-AT-E50 and the Efinix Topaz Tz170 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LAV-AT-E50Tz170
Vendor / familyLattice Avant-EEfinix Topaz
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)255,000172,201
LUTs as published255,000 LUT4172,201 LUT4
Vendor logic figure409,000 LC161,008 LE
DSP1,120 18×18 multipliers544 DSP blocks
Block RAM22.7 Mb11.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O553274
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages23
Design toolLattice RadiantEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The LAV-AT-E50 has about 48% more logic capacity (255K vs 172K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the LAV-AT-E50 has 1,120 18×18 multipliers against 544 DSP blocks on the Tz170.

The LAV-AT-E50 has more on-chip memory (22.7 Mb vs 11.1 Mb).

The LAV-AT-E50 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the Tz170 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LAV-AT-E50 (Avant-E) and Tz170 (Topaz).