FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LAV-AT-E70 vs XC2KU040P

A comparison of the Lattice Avant-E LAV-AT-E70 and the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ Gen 2 XC2KU040P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LAV-AT-E70XC2KU040P
Vendor / familyLattice Avant-EAMD Kintex UltraScale+ Gen 2
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)397,000299,200
LUTs as published397,000 LUT4187,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure637,000 LC410,000 SLC
DSP1,800 18×18 multipliers1,560 DSP slices
Block RAM35.6 Mb14.8 Mb
Large RAM—22.5 Mb
Max. user I/O553474
TransceiversNone16 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen4 x8
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages42
Design toolLattice RadiantAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The LAV-AT-E70 has about 33% more logic capacity (397K vs 299K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the LAV-AT-E70 is built from LUT4 and the XC2KU040P from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (397K vs 187K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the LAV-AT-E70 has 1,800 18×18 multipliers against 1,560 DSP slices on the XC2KU040P.

Only the XC2KU040P has multi-gigabit transceivers (16 32.75 Gb/s).

The LAV-AT-E70 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the XC2KU040P with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LAV-AT-E70 (Avant-E) and XC2KU040P (Kintex UltraScale+ Gen 2).