FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LAV-AT-G50 vs LAV-AT-X50

A comparison of the Lattice Avant-G LAV-AT-G50 and the Lattice Avant-X LAV-AT-X50 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LAV-AT-G50LAV-AT-X50
Vendor / familyLattice Avant-GLattice Avant-X
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)255,000255,000
LUTs as published255,000 LUT4255,000 LUT4
Vendor logic figure409,000 LC409,000 LC
DSP1,120 18×18 multipliers1,120 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM22.7 Mb22.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O298298
Transceivers16 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s16 × SERDES 25 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages21
Design toolLattice RadiantLattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 255K and 255K LUT4 equivalents.

Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the LAV-AT-G50 and 16 at up to 25 Gb/s on the LAV-AT-X50.

The LAV-AT-G50 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the LAV-AT-X50 with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LAV-AT-G50 (Avant-G) and LAV-AT-X50 (Avant-X).