FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LAV-AT-G50 vs MPF300T

A comparison of the Lattice Avant-G LAV-AT-G50 and the Microchip PolarFire MPF300T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LAV-AT-G50MPF300T
Vendor / familyLattice Avant-GMicrochip PolarFire
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)255,000300,000
LUTs as published255,000 LUT4300,000 LUT4
Vendor logic figure409,000 LC300,000 LE
DSP1,120 18×18 multipliers924 18×18 math blocks (MACC)
Block RAM22.7 Mb18.6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O298512
Transceivers16 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s16 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen2 x4
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMNon-volatile (SONOS flash)
Packages25
Design toolLattice RadiantMicrochip Libero SoC

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The MPF300T has about 18% more logic capacity (300K vs 255K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the LAV-AT-G50 has 1,120 18×18 multipliers against 924 18×18 math blocks (MACC) on the MPF300T.

The LAV-AT-G50 has more on-chip memory (22.7 Mb vs 18.6 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the LAV-AT-G50 and 16 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the MPF300T.

Configuration memory: sram on the LAV-AT-G50, non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPF300T.

The LAV-AT-G50 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the MPF300T with Microchip Libero SoC.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LAV-AT-G50 (Avant-G) and MPF300T (PolarFire).