FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LAV-AT-G70 vs XC7K420T

A comparison of the Lattice Avant-G LAV-AT-G70 and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K420T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LAV-AT-G70XC7K420T
Vendor / familyLattice Avant-GAMD Kintex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)397,000416,960
LUTs as published397,000 LUT4260,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure637,000 LC416,960 LC
DSP1,800 18×18 multipliers1,680 DSP slices
Block RAM35.6 Mb29.4 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O554400
Transceivers28 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s32 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages32
Design toolLattice RadiantAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 397K and 417K LUT4 equivalents.

They use different logic architectures: the LAV-AT-G70 is built from LUT4 and the XC7K420T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (397K vs 261K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the LAV-AT-G70 has 1,800 18×18 multipliers against 1,680 DSP slices on the XC7K420T.

The LAV-AT-G70 has more on-chip memory (35.6 Mb vs 29.4 Mb).

The LAV-AT-G70 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the XC7K420T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LAV-AT-G70 (Avant-G) and XC7K420T (Kintex-7).