FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LAV-AT-G70 vs XC7K480T

A comparison of the Lattice Avant-G LAV-AT-G70 and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K480T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LAV-AT-G70XC7K480T
Vendor / familyLattice Avant-GAMD Kintex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)397,000477,760
LUTs as published397,000 LUT4298,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure637,000 LC477,760 LC
DSP1,800 18×18 multipliers1,920 DSP slices
Block RAM35.6 Mb33.6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O554400
Transceivers28 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s32 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages32
Design toolLattice RadiantAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7K480T has about 20% more logic capacity (478K vs 397K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the LAV-AT-G70 is built from LUT4 and the XC7K480T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (397K vs 299K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7K480T has 1,920 DSP slices against 1,800 18×18 multipliers on the LAV-AT-G70.

The LAV-AT-G70 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the XC7K480T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LAV-AT-G70 (Avant-G) and XC7K480T (Kintex-7).