FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LAV-AT-X30 vs MPF200T

A comparison of the Lattice Avant-X LAV-AT-X30 and the Microchip PolarFire MPF200T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LAV-AT-X30MPF200T
Vendor / familyLattice Avant-XMicrochip PolarFire
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)163,000192,000
LUTs as published163,000 LUT4192,000 LUT4
Vendor logic figure262,000 LC192,000 LE
DSP700 18×18 multipliers588 18×18 math blocks (MACC)
Block RAM14.4 Mb12 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O298368
Transceivers12 × SERDES 25 Gb/s16 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen2 x4
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMNon-volatile (SONOS flash)
Packages25
Design toolLattice RadiantMicrochip Libero SoC

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The MPF200T has about 18% more logic capacity (192K vs 163K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the LAV-AT-X30 has 700 18×18 multipliers against 588 18×18 math blocks (MACC) on the MPF200T.

The LAV-AT-X30 has more on-chip memory (14.4 Mb vs 12 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 12 at up to 25 Gb/s on the LAV-AT-X30 and 16 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the MPF200T.

Configuration memory: sram on the LAV-AT-X30, non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPF200T.

The LAV-AT-X30 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the MPF200T with Microchip Libero SoC.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LAV-AT-X30 (Avant-X) and MPF200T (PolarFire).