LAV-AT-X30 vs XC7K160T
A comparison of the Lattice Avant-X LAV-AT-X30 and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K160T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| LAV-AT-X30 | XC7K160T | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Lattice Avant-X | AMD Kintex-7 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 163,000 | 162,240 |
| LUTs as published | 163,000 LUT4 | 101,400 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 262,000 LC | 162,240 LC |
| DSP | 700 18×18 multipliers | 600 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 14.4 Mb | 11.4 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 298 | 400 |
| Transceivers | 12 × SERDES 25 Gb/s | 8 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | None | Gen2 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 3 |
| Design tool | Lattice Radiant | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 163K and 162K LUT4 equivalents.
They use different logic architectures: the LAV-AT-X30 is built from LUT4 and the XC7K160T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (163K vs 101K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the LAV-AT-X30 has 700 18×18 multipliers against 600 DSP slices on the XC7K160T.
The LAV-AT-X30 has more on-chip memory (14.4 Mb vs 11.4 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 12 at up to 25 Gb/s on the LAV-AT-X30 and 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K160T.
The LAV-AT-X30 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the XC7K160T with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LAV-AT-X30 (Avant-X) and XC7K160T (Kintex-7).