LAV-AT-X50 vs XC2KU030P
A comparison of the Lattice Avant-X LAV-AT-X50 and the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ Gen 2 XC2KU030P using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| LAV-AT-X50 | XC2KU030P | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Lattice Avant-X | AMD Kintex UltraScale+ Gen 2 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 255,000 | 240,000 |
| LUTs as published | 255,000 LUT4 | 150,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 409,000 LC | 328,000 SLC |
| DSP | 1,120 18×18 multipliers | 1,248 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 22.7 Mb | 11.8 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | 18 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 298 | 342 |
| Transceivers | 16 × SERDES 25 Gb/s | 16 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | None | Gen4 x8 |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 1 | 2 |
| Design tool | Lattice Radiant | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 255K and 240K LUT4 equivalents.
They use different logic architectures: the LAV-AT-X50 is built from LUT4 and the XC2KU030P from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (255K vs 150K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XC2KU030P has 1,248 DSP slices against 1,120 18×18 multipliers on the LAV-AT-X50.
The XC2KU030P has more on-chip memory (29.8 Mb vs 22.7 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 25 Gb/s on the LAV-AT-X50 and 16 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XC2KU030P.
The LAV-AT-X50 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the XC2KU030P with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LAV-AT-X50 (Avant-X) and XC2KU030P (Kintex UltraScale+ Gen 2).