FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LCMXO2-2000 vs LFMXO4D-040

A comparison of the Lattice MachXO2 LCMXO2-2000 and the Lattice MachXO4 LFMXO4D-040 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LCMXO2-2000LFMXO4D-040
Vendor / familyLattice MachXO2Lattice MachXO4
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)2,1123,000
LUTs as published2,112 LUT43,000 LUT4
Vendor logic figure— LC3,600 LC
DSP— 18×18 multipliers— 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM0.1 Mb0.1 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O206204
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process65 nm—
Configuration memoryInternal flashInternal flash
Packages65
Design toolLattice DiamondLattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The LFMXO4D-040 has about 42% more logic capacity (3K vs 2.1K LUT4 equivalents).

The LFMXO4D-040 has more on-chip memory (0.1 Mb vs 0.1 Mb).

The LCMXO2-2000 is designed with Lattice Diamond and the LFMXO4D-040 with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LCMXO2-2000 (MachXO2) and LFMXO4D-040 (MachXO4).