LCMXO2-2000U vs LCMXO3L-2100
A comparison of the Lattice MachXO2 LCMXO2-2000U and the Lattice MachXO3 LCMXO3L-2100 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| LCMXO2-2000U | LCMXO3L-2100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Lattice MachXO2 | Lattice MachXO3 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 2,112 | 2,100 |
| LUTs as published | 2,112 LUT4 | 2,100 LUT4 |
| Vendor logic figure | — LC | — LC |
| DSP | — 18×18 multipliers | — 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | 0.1 Mb | 0.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 278 | 279 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 65 nm | — |
| Configuration memory | Internal flash | — |
| Packages | 1 | 8 |
| Design tool | Lattice Diamond | Lattice Diamond |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 2.1K and 2.1K LUT4 equivalents.
The LCMXO2-2000U has more on-chip memory (0.1 Mb vs 0.1 Mb).
Configuration memory: internal flash on the LCMXO2-2000U, — on the LCMXO3L-2100.
The LCMXO2-2000U is designed with Lattice Diamond and the LCMXO3L-2100 with Lattice Diamond.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LCMXO2-2000U (MachXO2) and LCMXO3L-2100 (MachXO3).