LCMXO2-256 vs iCE40LP384
A comparison of the Lattice MachXO2 LCMXO2-256 and the Lattice iCE40 LP/HX/LM iCE40LP384 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| LCMXO2-256 | iCE40LP384 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Lattice MachXO2 | Lattice iCE40 LP/HX/LM |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 256 | 384 |
| LUTs as published | 256 LUT4 | 384 LUT4 |
| Vendor logic figure | — LC | 384 LC |
| DSP | — 18×18 multipliers | — 16×16 MAC blocks |
| Block RAM | — | — |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 55 | 39 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Configuration memory | Internal flash | NVCM or SRAM |
| Packages | 5 | 3 |
| Design tool | Lattice Diamond | Lattice iCEcube2 |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The iCE40LP384 has about 50% more logic capacity (384 vs 256 LUT4 equivalents).
Configuration memory: internal flash on the LCMXO2-256, nvcm or sram on the iCE40LP384.
The LCMXO2-256 is designed with Lattice Diamond and the iCE40LP384 with Lattice iCEcube2.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LCMXO2-256 (MachXO2) and iCE40LP384 (iCE40 LP/HX/LM).