LCMXO3L-9400 vs LFMXO4D-110
A comparison of the Lattice MachXO3 LCMXO3L-9400 and the Lattice MachXO4 LFMXO4D-110 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| LCMXO3L-9400 | LFMXO4D-110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Lattice MachXO3 | Lattice MachXO4 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 9,400 | 9,400 |
| LUTs as published | 9,400 LUT4 | 9,400 LUT4 |
| Vendor logic figure | — LC | 11,300 LC |
| DSP | — 18×18 multipliers | — 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | 0.4 Mb | 0.4 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 384 | 381 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | — | — |
| Configuration memory | — | Internal flash |
| Packages | 4 | 6 |
| Design tool | Lattice Diamond | Lattice Radiant |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 9.4K and 9.4K LUT4 equivalents.
Configuration memory: — on the LCMXO3L-9400, internal flash on the LFMXO4D-110.
The LCMXO3L-9400 is designed with Lattice Diamond and the LFMXO4D-110 with Lattice Radiant.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LCMXO3L-9400 (MachXO3) and LFMXO4D-110 (MachXO4).