FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LFD2NX-40 vs LIFCL-33

A comparison of the Lattice Certus-NX LFD2NX-40 and the Lattice CrossLink-NX LIFCL-33 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LFD2NX-40LIFCL-33
Vendor / familyLattice Certus-NXLattice CrossLink-NX
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)32,50027,500
LUTs as published32,500 LUT427,500 LUT4
Vendor logic figure39,000 LC33,000 LC
DSP56 18×18 multipliers64 18×18 multipliers
Block RAM1.5 Mb1.1 Mb
Large RAM1 Mb2.5 Mb
Max. user I/O19160
Transceivers1 × SERDES 5 Gb/sNone
Hard PCI ExpressGen2None
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages31
Design toolLattice RadiantLattice Radiant

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The LFD2NX-40 has about 18% more logic capacity (32.5K vs 27.5K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the LIFCL-33 has 64 18×18 multipliers against 56 18×18 multipliers on the LFD2NX-40.

The LIFCL-33 has more on-chip memory (3.6 Mb vs 2.5 Mb).

Only the LFD2NX-40 has multi-gigabit transceivers (1 5 Gb/s).

The LFD2NX-40 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the LIFCL-33 with Lattice Radiant.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LFD2NX-40 (Certus-NX) and LIFCL-33 (CrossLink-NX).