FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LFD2NX-65 vs XC7S50

A comparison of the Lattice Certus-NX LFD2NX-65 and the AMD Spartan-7 XC7S50 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LFD2NX-65XC7S50
Vendor / familyLattice Certus-NXAMD Spartan-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)54,16752,160
LUTs as published54,167 LUT432,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure65,000 LC52,160 LC
DSP128 18×18 multipliers120 DSP slices
Block RAM2.2 Mb2.6 Mb
Large RAM1 Mb—
Max. user I/O371250
Transceivers1 × SERDES 5 Gb/sNone
Hard PCI ExpressGen2None
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages33
Design toolLattice RadiantAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 54.2K and 52.2K LUT4 equivalents.

They use different logic architectures: the LFD2NX-65 is built from LUT4 and the XC7S50 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (54.2K vs 32.6K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the LFD2NX-65 has 128 18×18 multipliers against 120 DSP slices on the XC7S50.

The LFD2NX-65 has more on-chip memory (3.2 Mb vs 2.6 Mb).

Only the LFD2NX-65 has multi-gigabit transceivers (1 5 Gb/s).

The LFD2NX-65 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the XC7S50 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LFD2NX-65 (Certus-NX) and XC7S50 (Spartan-7).