LFD2NX-9 vs LIFCL-17
A comparison of the Lattice Certus-NX LFD2NX-9 and the Lattice CrossLink-NX LIFCL-17 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| LFD2NX-9 | LIFCL-17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Lattice Certus-NX | Lattice CrossLink-NX |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 7,500 | 14,167 |
| LUTs as published | 7,500 LUT4 | 14,167 LUT4 |
| Vendor logic figure | 9,000 LC | 17,000 LC |
| DSP | 12 18×18 multipliers | 24 18×18 multipliers |
| Block RAM | 0.3 Mb | 0.4 Mb |
| Large RAM | 1.5 Mb | 2.5 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 77 | 77 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 4 |
| Design tool | Lattice Radiant | Lattice Radiant |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The LIFCL-17 has about 89% more logic capacity (14.2K vs 7.5K LUT4 equivalents).
For arithmetic, the LIFCL-17 has 24 18×18 multipliers against 12 18×18 multipliers on the LFD2NX-9.
The LIFCL-17 has more on-chip memory (2.9 Mb vs 1.8 Mb).
The LFD2NX-9 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the LIFCL-17 with Lattice Radiant.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LFD2NX-9 (Certus-NX) and LIFCL-17 (CrossLink-NX).