FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LFD2NX-9 vs XC7S6

A comparison of the Lattice Certus-NX LFD2NX-9 and the AMD Spartan-7 XC7S6 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LFD2NX-9XC7S6
Vendor / familyLattice Certus-NXAMD Spartan-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)7,5006,003
LUTs as published7,500 LUT43,752 LUT6
Vendor logic figure9,000 LC6,000 LC
DSP12 18×18 multipliers10 DSP slices
Block RAM0.3 Mb0.2 Mb
Large RAM1.5 Mb—
Max. user I/O77100
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages23
Design toolLattice RadiantAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The LFD2NX-9 has about 25% more logic capacity (7.5K vs 6K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the LFD2NX-9 is built from LUT4 and the XC7S6 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (7.5K vs 3.8K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the LFD2NX-9 has 12 18×18 multipliers against 10 DSP slices on the XC7S6.

The LFD2NX-9 has more on-chip memory (1.8 Mb vs 0.2 Mb).

The LFD2NX-9 is designed with Lattice Radiant and the XC7S6 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LFD2NX-9 (Certus-NX) and XC7S6 (Spartan-7).