FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

LFE5UM-45 vs XC7A35T

A comparison of the Lattice ECP5 LFE5UM-45 and the AMD Artix-7 XC7A35T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

LFE5UM-45XC7A35T
Vendor / familyLattice ECP5AMD Artix-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)44,00033,280
LUTs as published44,000 LUT420,800 LUT6
Vendor logic figure— LC33,280 LC
DSP72 18×18 multipliers90 DSP slices
Block RAM1.9 Mb1.8 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O245250
Transceivers4 × SERDES 3.2 Gb/s4 × GTP 6.6 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressNoneGen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process40 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages35
Design toolLattice DiamondAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The LFE5UM-45 has about 32% more logic capacity (44K vs 33.3K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the LFE5UM-45 is built from LUT4 and the XC7A35T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (44K vs 20.8K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7A35T has 90 DSP slices against 72 18×18 multipliers on the LFE5UM-45.

Both have transceivers: 4 at up to 3.2 Gb/s on the LFE5UM-45 and 4 at up to 6.6 Gb/s on the XC7A35T.

The LFE5UM-45 is designed with Lattice Diamond and the XC7A35T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: LFE5UM-45 (ECP5) and XC7A35T (Artix-7).