FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

MPF500T vs XC7K410T

A comparison of the Microchip PolarFire MPF500T and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K410T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

MPF500TXC7K410T
Vendor / familyMicrochip PolarFireAMD Kintex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)481,000406,720
LUTs as published481,000 LUT4254,200 LUT6
Vendor logic figure481,000 LE406,720 LC
DSP1,480 18×18 math blocks (MACC)1,540 DSP slices
Block RAM29.7 Mb27.9 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O584500
Transceivers24 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s16 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2 x4Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memoryNon-volatile (SONOS flash)SRAM
Packages24
Design toolMicrochip Libero SoCAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The MPF500T has about 18% more logic capacity (481K vs 407K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the MPF500T is built from LUT4 and the XC7K410T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (481K vs 254K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7K410T has 1,540 DSP slices against 1,480 18×18 math blocks (MACC) on the MPF500T.

Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the MPF500T and 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K410T.

Configuration memory: non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPF500T, sram on the XC7K410T.

The MPF500T is designed with Microchip Libero SoC and the XC7K410T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: MPF500T (PolarFire) and XC7K410T (Kintex-7).