FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

MPF500T vs XC7VX330T

A comparison of the Microchip PolarFire MPF500T and the AMD Virtex-7 XC7VX330T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

MPF500TXC7VX330T
Vendor / familyMicrochip PolarFireAMD Virtex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)481,000326,400
LUTs as published481,000 LUT4204,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure481,000 LE326,400 LC
DSP1,480 18×18 math blocks (MACC)1,120 DSP slices
Block RAM29.7 Mb26.4 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O584700
Transceivers24 × SERDES 12.7 Gb/s28 × GTH 13.1 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2 x4Gen3
Hard processorNoneNone
Process28 nm28 nm
Configuration memoryNon-volatile (SONOS flash)SRAM
Packages22
Design toolMicrochip Libero SoCAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The MPF500T has about 47% more logic capacity (481K vs 326K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the MPF500T is built from LUT4 and the XC7VX330T from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (481K vs 204K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the MPF500T has 1,480 18×18 math blocks (MACC) against 1,120 DSP slices on the XC7VX330T.

The MPF500T has more on-chip memory (29.7 Mb vs 26.4 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 12.7 Gb/s on the MPF500T and 28 at up to 13.1 Gb/s on the XC7VX330T.

Configuration memory: non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPF500T, sram on the XC7VX330T.

The MPF500T is designed with Microchip Libero SoC and the XC7VX330T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: MPF500T (PolarFire) and XC7VX330T (Virtex-7).