FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

MPFS250T vs Ti240

A comparison of the Microchip PolarFire SoC MPFS250T and the Efinix Titanium Ti240 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

MPFS250TTi240
Vendor / familyMicrochip PolarFire SoCEfinix Titanium
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)254,000232,240
LUTs as published254,000 LUT4232,240 LUT4
Vendor logic figure254,000 LE236,888 LE
DSP784 18×18 math blocks (MACC)860 DSP blocks
Block RAM15.9 Mb17.6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O372337
Transceivers16 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s16 × SERDES 16 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2 x4Gen4 x4
Hard processor4× RISC-V (RV64GC U54)4× RISC-V RV32
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memoryNon-volatile (SONOS flash)SRAM
Packages45
Design toolMicrochip Libero SoCEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The MPFS250T has about 9% more logic capacity (254K vs 232K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the Ti240 has 860 DSP blocks against 784 18×18 math blocks (MACC) on the MPFS250T.

Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the MPFS250T and 16 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Ti240.

Configuration memory: non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPFS250T, sram on the Ti240.

The MPFS250T is designed with Microchip Libero SoC and the Ti240 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: MPFS250T (PolarFire SoC) and Ti240 (Titanium).