FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

MPFS250T vs Ti260

A comparison of the Microchip PolarFire SoC MPFS250T and the Efinix Titanium Ti260 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

MPFS250TTi260
Vendor / familyMicrochip PolarFire SoCEfinix Titanium
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)254,000264,384
LUTs as published254,000 LUT4— LUT4
Vendor logic figure254,000 LE264,384 LE
DSP784 18×18 math blocks (MACC)960 DSP blocks
Block RAM15.9 Mb19.7 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O372310
Transceivers16 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s16 × SERDES 16 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2 x4Gen4 x4
Hard processor4× RISC-V (RV64GC U54)4× RISC-V RV64
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memoryNon-volatile (SONOS flash)SRAM
Packages43
Design toolMicrochip Libero SoCEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 254K and 264K LUT4 equivalents.

For arithmetic, the Ti260 has 960 DSP blocks against 784 18×18 math blocks (MACC) on the MPFS250T.

The Ti260 has more on-chip memory (19.7 Mb vs 15.9 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the MPFS250T and 16 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Ti260.

Configuration memory: non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPFS250T, sram on the Ti260.

The MPFS250T is designed with Microchip Libero SoC and the Ti260 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: MPFS250T (PolarFire SoC) and Ti260 (Titanium).