FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

MPFS250T vs Tz200

A comparison of the Microchip PolarFire SoC MPFS250T and the Efinix Topaz Tz200 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

MPFS250TTz200
Vendor / familyMicrochip PolarFire SoCEfinix Topaz
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)254,000230,332
LUTs as published254,000 LUT4230,332 LUT4
Vendor logic figure254,000 LE215,360 LE
DSP784 18×18 math blocks (MACC)840 DSP blocks
Block RAM15.9 Mb15.8 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O372227
Transceivers16 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s16 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen2 x4Gen3 x4
Hard processor4× RISC-V (RV64GC U54)4× RISC-V
Process28 nm16 nm
Configuration memoryNon-volatile (SONOS flash)SRAM
Packages44
Design toolMicrochip Libero SoCEfinix Efinity

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The MPFS250T has about 10% more logic capacity (254K vs 230K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the Tz200 has 840 DSP blocks against 784 18×18 math blocks (MACC) on the MPFS250T.

Configuration memory: non-volatile (sonos flash) on the MPFS250T, sram on the Tz200.

The MPFS250T is designed with Microchip Libero SoC and the Tz200 with Efinix Efinity.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: MPFS250T (PolarFire SoC) and Tz200 (Topaz).