T13 vs XC7S15
A comparison of the Efinix Trion T13 and the AMD Spartan-7 XC7S15 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| T13 | XC7S15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Trion | AMD Spartan-7 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 12,828 | 12,800 |
| LUTs as published | — LUT4 | 8,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 12,828 LE | 12,800 LC |
| DSP | 24 18×18 multipliers | 20 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 0.7 Mb | 0.4 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 195 | 100 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 3 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 12.8K and 12.8K LUT4 equivalents.
They use different logic architectures: the T13 is built from LUT4 and the XC7S15 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (— vs 8K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the T13 has 24 18×18 multipliers against 20 DSP slices on the XC7S15.
The T13 has more on-chip memory (0.7 Mb vs 0.4 Mb).
The T13 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XC7S15 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: T13 (Trion) and XC7S15 (Spartan-7).