T55 vs XC7S50
A comparison of the Efinix Trion T55 and the AMD Spartan-7 XC7S50 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| T55 | XC7S50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Trion | AMD Spartan-7 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 54,195 | 52,160 |
| LUTs as published | — LUT4 | 32,600 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 54,195 LE | 52,160 LC |
| DSP | 150 18×18 multipliers | 120 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 2.7 Mb | 2.6 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 278 | 250 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 3 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 54.2K and 52.2K LUT4 equivalents.
They use different logic architectures: the T55 is built from LUT4 and the XC7S50 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (— vs 32.6K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the T55 has 150 18×18 multipliers against 120 DSP slices on the XC7S50.
The T55 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XC7S50 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: T55 (Trion) and XC7S50 (Spartan-7).