FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

T8 vs XC7S6

A comparison of the Efinix Trion T8 and the AMD Spartan-7 XC7S6 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

T8XC7S6
Vendor / familyEfinix TrionAMD Spartan-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)7,3846,003
LUTs as published— LUT43,752 LUT6
Vendor logic figure7,384 LE6,000 LC
DSP8 18×18 multipliers10 DSP slices
Block RAM0.1 Mb0.2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O97100
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process40 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages33
Design toolEfinix EfinityAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The T8 has about 23% more logic capacity (7.4K vs 6K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the T8 is built from LUT4 and the XC7S6 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (— vs 3.8K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7S6 has 10 DSP slices against 8 18×18 multipliers on the T8.

The XC7S6 has more on-chip memory (0.2 Mb vs 0.1 Mb).

The T8 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XC7S6 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: T8 (Trion) and XC7S6 (Spartan-7).