Ti165 vs XCZU4CG
A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti165 and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU4CG using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Ti165 | XCZU4CG | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Titanium | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 159,610 | 140,800 |
| LUTs as published | 159,610 LUT4 | 88,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 162,800 LE | 192,000 SLC |
| DSP | 590 DSP blocks | 728 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 12.1 Mb | 4.5 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | 13.5 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 337 | 252 |
| Transceivers | 16 × SERDES 16 Gb/s | 16 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen4 x4 | Gen3 x8 |
| Hard processor | 4× RISC-V RV32 | 2× Arm Cortex-A53 |
| Process | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 5 | 3 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The Ti165 has about 13% more logic capacity (160K vs 141K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the Ti165 is built from LUT4 and the XCZU4CG from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (160K vs 88K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XCZU4CG has 728 DSP slices against 590 DSP blocks on the Ti165.
The XCZU4CG has more on-chip memory (18 Mb vs 12.1 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Ti165 and 16 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCZU4CG.
The Ti165 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XCZU4CG with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti165 (Titanium) and XCZU4CG (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC).