Ti240 vs XC7Z035
A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti240 and the AMD Zynq 7000 XC7Z035 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Ti240 | XC7Z035 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Titanium | AMD Zynq 7000 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 232,240 | 275,040 |
| LUTs as published | 232,240 LUT4 | 171,900 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 236,888 LE | 275,000 LC |
| DSP | 860 DSP blocks | 900 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 17.6 Mb | 17.6 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 337 | 362 |
| Transceivers | 16 × SERDES 16 Gb/s | 16 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen4 x4 | Gen2 x8 |
| Hard processor | 4× RISC-V RV32 | 2× Arm Cortex-A9 |
| Process | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 5 | 3 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The XC7Z035 has about 18% more logic capacity (275K vs 232K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the Ti240 is built from LUT4 and the XC7Z035 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (232K vs 172K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XC7Z035 has 900 DSP slices against 860 DSP blocks on the Ti240.
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Ti240 and 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7Z035.
The Ti240 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XC7Z035 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti240 (Titanium) and XC7Z035 (Zynq 7000).