FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

Ti240 vs XCZU4EV

A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti240 and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU4EV using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

Ti240XCZU4EV
Vendor / familyEfinix TitaniumAMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)232,240140,800
LUTs as published232,240 LUT488,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure236,888 LE192,000 SLC
DSP860 DSP blocks728 DSP slices
Block RAM17.6 Mb4.5 Mb
Large RAM—13.5 Mb
Max. user I/O337252
Transceivers16 × SERDES 16 Gb/s16 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen4 x4Gen3 x8
Hard processor4× RISC-V RV324× Arm Cortex-A53
Process16 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages53
Design toolEfinix EfinityAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The Ti240 has about 65% more logic capacity (232K vs 141K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the Ti240 is built from LUT4 and the XCZU4EV from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (232K vs 88K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the Ti240 has 860 DSP blocks against 728 DSP slices on the XCZU4EV.

Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Ti240 and 16 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCZU4EV.

The Ti240 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XCZU4EV with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti240 (Titanium) and XCZU4EV (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC).