Ti240 vs XCZU5CG
A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti240 and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU5CG using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Ti240 | XCZU5CG | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Titanium | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 232,240 | 187,200 |
| LUTs as published | 232,240 LUT4 | 117,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 236,888 LE | 256,000 SLC |
| DSP | 860 DSP blocks | 1,248 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 17.6 Mb | 5.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | 18 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 337 | 252 |
| Transceivers | 16 × SERDES 16 Gb/s | 16 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen4 x4 | Gen3 x8 |
| Hard processor | 4× RISC-V RV32 | 2× Arm Cortex-A53 |
| Process | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 5 | 3 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The Ti240 has about 24% more logic capacity (232K vs 187K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the Ti240 is built from LUT4 and the XCZU5CG from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (232K vs 117K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XCZU5CG has 1,248 DSP slices against 860 DSP blocks on the Ti240.
The XCZU5CG has more on-chip memory (23.1 Mb vs 17.6 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Ti240 and 16 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCZU5CG.
The Ti240 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XCZU5CG with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti240 (Titanium) and XCZU5CG (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC).