Ti260 vs XC7Z045
A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti260 and the AMD Zynq 7000 XC7Z045 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Ti260 | XC7Z045 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Titanium | AMD Zynq 7000 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 264,384 | 349,760 |
| LUTs as published | — LUT4 | 218,600 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 264,384 LE | 350,000 LC |
| DSP | 960 DSP blocks | 900 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 19.7 Mb | 19.2 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 310 | 362 |
| Transceivers | 16 × SERDES 16 Gb/s | 16 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen4 x4 | Gen2 x8 |
| Hard processor | 4× RISC-V RV64 | 2× Arm Cortex-A9 |
| Process | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 3 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The XC7Z045 has about 32% more logic capacity (350K vs 264K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the Ti260 is built from LUT4 and the XC7Z045 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (— vs 219K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the Ti260 has 960 DSP blocks against 900 DSP slices on the XC7Z045.
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Ti260 and 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7Z045.
The Ti260 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XC7Z045 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti260 (Titanium) and XC7Z045 (Zynq 7000).