Ti260 vs XCZU5EV
A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti260 and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU5EV using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Ti260 | XCZU5EV | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Titanium | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 264,384 | 187,200 |
| LUTs as published | — LUT4 | 117,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 264,384 LE | 256,000 SLC |
| DSP | 960 DSP blocks | 1,248 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 19.7 Mb | 5.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | 18 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 310 | 252 |
| Transceivers | 16 × SERDES 16 Gb/s | 16 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen4 x4 | Gen3 x8 |
| Hard processor | 4× RISC-V RV64 | 4× Arm Cortex-A53 |
| Process | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 3 | 3 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The Ti260 has about 41% more logic capacity (264K vs 187K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the Ti260 is built from LUT4 and the XCZU5EV from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (— vs 117K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XCZU5EV has 1,248 DSP slices against 960 DSP blocks on the Ti260.
The XCZU5EV has more on-chip memory (23.1 Mb vs 19.7 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Ti260 and 16 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCZU5EV.
The Ti260 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XCZU5EV with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti260 (Titanium) and XCZU5EV (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC).