Ti375 vs XCZU9CG
A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti375 and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU9CG using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Ti375 | XCZU9CG | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Titanium | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 362,880 | 438,400 |
| LUTs as published | 362,880 LUT4 | 274,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 370,137 LE | 600,000 SLC |
| DSP | 1,344 DSP blocks | 2,520 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 27.5 Mb | 32.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 337 | 328 |
| Transceivers | 16 × SERDES 16 Gb/s | 24 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen4 x4 | None |
| Hard processor | 4× RISC-V RV32 | 2× Arm Cortex-A53 |
| Process | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 5 | 2 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The XCZU9CG has about 21% more logic capacity (438K vs 363K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the Ti375 is built from LUT4 and the XCZU9CG from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (363K vs 274K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XCZU9CG has 2,520 DSP slices against 1,344 DSP blocks on the Ti375.
The XCZU9CG has more on-chip memory (32.1 Mb vs 27.5 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 16 Gb/s on the Ti375 and 24 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCZU9CG.
The Ti375 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XCZU9CG with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti375 (Titanium) and XCZU9CG (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC).