FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

Ti60 vs XC7S50

A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti60 and the AMD Spartan-7 XC7S50 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

Ti60XC7S50
Vendor / familyEfinix TitaniumAMD Spartan-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)60,80052,160
LUTs as published60,800 LUT432,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure62,016 LE52,160 LC
DSP160 DSP blocks120 DSP slices
Block RAM2.6 Mb2.6 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O169250
TransceiversNoneNone
Hard PCI ExpressNoneNone
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages43
Design toolEfinix EfinityAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The Ti60 has about 17% more logic capacity (60.8K vs 52.2K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the Ti60 is built from LUT4 and the XC7S50 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (60.8K vs 32.6K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the Ti60 has 160 DSP blocks against 120 DSP slices on the XC7S50.

The Ti60 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XC7S50 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti60 (Titanium) and XC7S50 (Spartan-7).