FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

Ti800 vs XCZU17EG

A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti800 and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU17EG using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

Ti800XCZU17EG
Vendor / familyEfinix TitaniumAMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)796,262676,800
LUTs as published— LUT4423,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure796,262 LE926,000 SLC
DSP1,536 DSP blocks1,590 DSP slices
Block RAM47.2 Mb28 Mb
Large RAM—28.7 Mb
Max. user I/O480668
Transceivers24 × SERDES 25.8 Gb/s44 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s, 28 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen4 x8Gen3 x16
Hard processor4× RISC-V RV644× Arm Cortex-A53
Process16 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages24
Design toolEfinix EfinityAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The Ti800 has about 18% more logic capacity (796K vs 677K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the Ti800 is built from LUT4 and the XCZU17EG from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (— vs 423K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XCZU17EG has 1,590 DSP slices against 1,536 DSP blocks on the Ti800.

The XCZU17EG has more on-chip memory (56.7 Mb vs 47.2 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 25.8 Gb/s on the Ti800 and 72 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XCZU17EG.

The Ti800 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XCZU17EG with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti800 (Titanium) and XCZU17EG (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC).