Ti95 vs XC7S100
A comparison of the Efinix Titanium Ti95 and the AMD Spartan-7 XC7S100 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Ti95 | XC7S100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Titanium | AMD Spartan-7 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 93,200 | 102,400 |
| LUTs as published | — LUT4 | 64,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 93,200 LE | 102,400 LC |
| DSP | 210 DSP blocks | 160 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 4.5 Mb | 4.2 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 241 | 400 |
| Transceivers | None | None |
| Hard PCI Express | None | None |
| Hard processor | None | None |
| Process | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 2 | 2 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The XC7S100 has about 10% more logic capacity (102K vs 93.2K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the Ti95 is built from LUT4 and the XC7S100 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (— vs 64K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the Ti95 has 210 DSP blocks against 160 DSP slices on the XC7S100.
The Ti95 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XC7S100 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Ti95 (Titanium) and XC7S100 (Spartan-7).