FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

Tz100 vs XC7Z030

A comparison of the Efinix Topaz Tz100 and the AMD Zynq 7000 XC7Z030 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

Tz100XC7Z030
Vendor / familyEfinix TopazAMD Zynq 7000
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)108,492125,760
LUTs as published108,492 LUT478,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure101,440 LE125,000 LC
DSP312 DSP blocks400 DSP slices
Block RAM6.3 Mb9.3 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O223250
Transceivers8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s4 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x4Gen2 x4
Hard processor4× RISC-V2× Arm Cortex-A9
Process16 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages44
Design toolEfinix EfinityAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7Z030 has about 16% more logic capacity (126K vs 108K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the Tz100 is built from LUT4 and the XC7Z030 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (108K vs 78.6K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XC7Z030 has 400 DSP slices against 312 DSP blocks on the Tz100.

The XC7Z030 has more on-chip memory (9.3 Mb vs 6.3 Mb).

The Tz100 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XC7Z030 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Tz100 (Topaz) and XC7Z030 (Zynq 7000).