Tz200 vs XCZU4CG
A comparison of the Efinix Topaz Tz200 and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU4CG using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Tz200 | XCZU4CG | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Topaz | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 230,332 | 140,800 |
| LUTs as published | 230,332 LUT4 | 88,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 215,360 LE | 192,000 SLC |
| DSP | 840 DSP blocks | 728 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 15.8 Mb | 4.5 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | 13.5 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 227 | 252 |
| Transceivers | 16 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s | 16 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x4 | Gen3 x8 |
| Hard processor | 4× RISC-V | 2× Arm Cortex-A53 |
| Process | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 4 | 3 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The Tz200 has about 64% more logic capacity (230K vs 141K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the Tz200 is built from LUT4 and the XCZU4CG from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (230K vs 88K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the Tz200 has 840 DSP blocks against 728 DSP slices on the XCZU4CG.
The XCZU4CG has more on-chip memory (18 Mb vs 15.8 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the Tz200 and 16 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCZU4CG.
The Tz200 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XCZU4CG with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Tz200 (Topaz) and XCZU4CG (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC).