Tz200 vs XCZU5CG
A comparison of the Efinix Topaz Tz200 and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU5CG using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Tz200 | XCZU5CG | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Topaz | AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 230,332 | 187,200 |
| LUTs as published | 230,332 LUT4 | 117,000 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 215,360 LE | 256,000 SLC |
| DSP | 840 DSP blocks | 1,248 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 15.8 Mb | 5.1 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | 18 Mb |
| Max. user I/O | 227 | 252 |
| Transceivers | 16 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s | 16 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x4 | Gen3 x8 |
| Hard processor | 4× RISC-V | 2× Arm Cortex-A53 |
| Process | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 4 | 3 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The Tz200 has about 23% more logic capacity (230K vs 187K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the Tz200 is built from LUT4 and the XCZU5CG from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (230K vs 117K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the XCZU5CG has 1,248 DSP slices against 840 DSP blocks on the Tz200.
The XCZU5CG has more on-chip memory (23.1 Mb vs 15.8 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the Tz200 and 16 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCZU5CG.
The Tz200 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XCZU5CG with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Tz200 (Topaz) and XCZU5CG (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC).