FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

Tz200 vs XCZU5EV

A comparison of the Efinix Topaz Tz200 and the AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU5EV using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

Tz200XCZU5EV
Vendor / familyEfinix TopazAMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)230,332187,200
LUTs as published230,332 LUT4117,000 LUT6
Vendor logic figure215,360 LE256,000 SLC
DSP840 DSP blocks1,248 DSP slices
Block RAM15.8 Mb5.1 Mb
Large RAM—18 Mb
Max. user I/O227252
Transceivers16 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s16 × GTH 16.3 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x4Gen3 x8
Hard processor4× RISC-V4× Arm Cortex-A53
Process16 nm16 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages43
Design toolEfinix EfinityAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The Tz200 has about 23% more logic capacity (230K vs 187K LUT4 equivalents).

They use different logic architectures: the Tz200 is built from LUT4 and the XCZU5EV from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (230K vs 117K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the XCZU5EV has 1,248 DSP slices against 840 DSP blocks on the Tz200.

The XCZU5EV has more on-chip memory (23.1 Mb vs 15.8 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the Tz200 and 16 at up to 16.3 Gb/s on the XCZU5EV.

The Tz200 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XCZU5EV with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Tz200 (Topaz) and XCZU5EV (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC).