FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

Tz325 vs XC7Z045

A comparison of the Efinix Topaz Tz325 and the AMD Zynq 7000 XC7Z045 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

Tz325XC7Z045
Vendor / familyEfinix TopazAMD Zynq 7000
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)348,749349,760
LUTs as published348,749 LUT4218,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure326,080 LE350,000 LC
DSP1,008 DSP blocks900 DSP slices
Block RAM19.2 Mb19.2 Mb
Large RAM——
Max. user I/O227362
Transceivers16 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s16 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen3 x4Gen2 x8
Hard processor4× RISC-V2× Arm Cortex-A9
Process16 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages43
Design toolEfinix EfinityAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

Both devices offer similar logic capacity: 349K and 350K LUT4 equivalents.

They use different logic architectures: the Tz325 is built from LUT4 and the XC7Z045 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (349K vs 219K) are not directly comparable.

For arithmetic, the Tz325 has 1,008 DSP blocks against 900 DSP slices on the XC7Z045.

The Tz325 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XC7Z045 with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Tz325 (Topaz) and XC7Z045 (Zynq 7000).