Tz75 vs XC7Z015
A comparison of the Efinix Topaz Tz75 and the AMD Zynq 7000 XC7Z015 using the data from both vendors' selection guides.
Side-by-side specifications
| Tz75 | XC7Z015 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / family | Efinix Topaz | AMD Zynq 7000 |
| Logic (LUT4-equivalent) | 80,770 | 73,920 |
| LUTs as published | 80,770 LUT4 | 46,200 LUT6 |
| Vendor logic figure | 75,520 LE | 74,000 LC |
| DSP | 264 DSP blocks | 160 DSP slices |
| Block RAM | 5.3 Mb | 3.3 Mb |
| Large RAM | — | — |
| Max. user I/O | 223 | 150 |
| Transceivers | 8 × SERDES 12.5 Gb/s | 4 × GTP 6.25 Gb/s |
| Hard PCI Express | Gen3 x4 | Gen2 x4 |
| Hard processor | 4× RISC-V | 2× Arm Cortex-A9 |
| Process | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Configuration memory | SRAM | SRAM |
| Packages | 4 | 1 |
| Design tool | Efinix Efinity | AMD Vivado |
Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.
Key differences
The Tz75 has about 9% more logic capacity (80.8K vs 73.9K LUT4 equivalents).
They use different logic architectures: the Tz75 is built from LUT4 and the XC7Z015 from LUT6, so the raw LUT counts (80.8K vs 46.2K) are not directly comparable.
For arithmetic, the Tz75 has 264 DSP blocks against 160 DSP slices on the XC7Z015.
The Tz75 has more on-chip memory (5.3 Mb vs 3.3 Mb).
Both have transceivers: 8 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the Tz75 and 4 at up to 6.25 Gb/s on the XC7Z015.
The Tz75 is designed with Efinix Efinity and the XC7Z015 with AMD Vivado.
Full specifications
See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: Tz75 (Topaz) and XC7Z015 (Zynq 7000).