FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC2KU040P vs XC7K410T

A comparison of the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ Gen 2 XC2KU040P and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K410T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC2KU040PXC7K410T
Vendor / familyAMD Kintex UltraScale+ Gen 2AMD Kintex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)299,200406,720
LUTs as published187,000 LUT6254,200 LUT6
Vendor logic figure410,000 SLC406,720 LC
DSP1,560 DSP slices1,540 DSP slices
Block RAM14.8 Mb27.9 Mb
Large RAM22.5 Mb—
Max. user I/O474500
Transceivers16 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s16 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen4 x8Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages24
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7K410T has about 36% more logic capacity (407K vs 299K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XC2KU040P has 1,560 DSP slices against 1,540 DSP slices on the XC7K410T.

The XC2KU040P has more on-chip memory (37.3 Mb vs 27.9 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 16 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XC2KU040P and 16 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K410T.

The XC2KU040P is designed with AMD Vivado and the XC7K410T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC2KU040P (Kintex UltraScale+ Gen 2) and XC7K410T (Kintex-7).