FPGA & adaptive SoC databook · online editionRev. 2026.10

XC2KU050P vs XC7K480T

A comparison of the AMD Kintex UltraScale+ Gen 2 XC2KU050P and the AMD Kintex-7 XC7K480T using the data from both vendors' selection guides.

Side-by-side specifications

XC2KU050PXC7K480T
Vendor / familyAMD Kintex UltraScale+ Gen 2AMD Kintex-7
Logic (LUT4-equivalent)360,000477,760
LUTs as published225,000 LUT6298,600 LUT6
Vendor logic figure491,000 SLC477,760 LC
DSP1,872 DSP slices1,920 DSP slices
Block RAM17.7 Mb33.6 Mb
Large RAM27 Mb—
Max. user I/O516400
Transceivers24 × GTY 32.75 Gb/s32 × GTX 12.5 Gb/s
Hard PCI ExpressGen4 x8Gen2
Hard processorNoneNone
Process16 nm28 nm
Configuration memorySRAMSRAM
Packages22
Design toolAMD VivadoAMD Vivado

Highlighted values are higher. Logic is compared in LUT4 equivalents; see how FPGA vendors count logic.

Key differences

The XC7K480T has about 33% more logic capacity (478K vs 360K LUT4 equivalents).

For arithmetic, the XC7K480T has 1,920 DSP slices against 1,872 DSP slices on the XC2KU050P.

The XC2KU050P has more on-chip memory (44.7 Mb vs 33.6 Mb).

Both have transceivers: 24 at up to 32.75 Gb/s on the XC2KU050P and 32 at up to 12.5 Gb/s on the XC7K480T.

The XC2KU050P is designed with AMD Vivado and the XC7K480T with AMD Vivado.

Full specifications

See the complete spec sheets with packages and grades: XC2KU050P (Kintex UltraScale+ Gen 2) and XC7K480T (Kintex-7).